This page was automatically translated and may contain errors. View in English.
ఎఫ్

PhD Peer Reviewer – Quantum Information

Fengkai Group Co., Limited

Remote · Part Time

దరఖాస్తు చేసుకునే వారిలో మొదటి వ్యక్తిగా ఉండండి

అనుభవం
ఏదైనా
జీతం
ఖాళీలు
1
పోస్ట్ చేయబడింది
2 రోజులు క్రితం
Work mode
ఇంటి నుండి పని
విద్య
PhD
Eligibility
Candidates with a PhD or equivalent advanced degree in the relevant subject area, plus at least 5 SCI/SSCI publications in the past 3 years, are eligible to apply. The role is suited to professionals who can work remotely on a part-time basis.
Resume
Required to apply

ఉద్యోగ వివరణ

Role overview

This is a long-term, steady part-time opportunity that can be carried out remotely. Applicants should review the requirements carefully and complete the application form with accurate details.

Eligibility and profile

  • You must hold a PhD or an equivalent advanced qualification in the relevant subject area.
  • A minimum of 5 papers published in SCI or SSCI journals during the last 3 years is required.
  • You should have a solid grasp of research methods and the ethical standards that apply to the discipline.
  • Strong analytical judgment and critical reasoning are essential.
  • You need excellent written communication skills to deliver clear, concise, and helpful feedback.
  • Applicants must be able to work to deadlines and manage time efficiently.
  • Discretion, neutrality, and confidentiality are expected throughout the review process.
  • Previous experience reviewing for academic journals is strongly preferred.
  • Comfort with online manuscript submission and peer-review platforms is important.

Key responsibilities

  • Judge whether the submission introduces original ideas or meaningfully expands knowledge in the field.
  • Review the research design and methodology for suitability, completeness, and clarity, with an eye on reproducibility.
  • Check that the manuscript reflects current and relevant scholarship through an appropriate literature review.
  • Assess whether the findings and conclusions are presented logically, backed by evidence, and meaningful to the discipline.
  • Offer constructive, specific feedback that points out weaknesses, missing details, and any ethical issues.
  • Make a recommendation on publication suitability, understanding that the final decision rests with the journal editor.

Additional notes

This engagement is intended to be stable and long term. It is part-time and remote, and the reviewer is expected to maintain objectivity and confidentiality at all times.

మీకు జవాబు కావాలంటే దాన్ని అలాగే వదిలేయండి — మేము దాన్ని మరే ఇతర అవసరం కోసం ఉపయోగించము.

బ్రౌజ్ చేయడానికి క్లిక్ చేయండి, డ్రాగ్ & డ్రాప్, లేదా పేస్ట్ స్క్రీన్‌షాట్

PNG, JPG, GIF, MP4, WebM, MOV · ఒక్కొక్కటి గరిష్టంగా 20MB · 5 ఫైళ్ల వరకు